Ford Library Usability Study

Case Study

According to web analytics, the Ford Library website, the site that currently homes the Duke Fuqua School of Business library resources, is underutilized and is in great need of a modern redesign in respect to both its user flow and visual design. The staff at Ford Library asked my team to conduct a usability study on their website and make concrete recommendations on how to modernize it.

10
heuristics analyzed
8
real Users tested
35+
Pages reorganized
12
High Fidelity Frames
Project Poster from Poster Fair

Project Overview

The Challenge

The Ford Library website faced persistent challenges with user engagement, confusing navigation paths, and outdated design. Despite offering valuable content, the site had not kept pace with modern usability standards and needed a user-centered redesign.

Our Approach

We conducted a two-phase evaluation process: a heuristic evaluation followed by formal usability testing with real users. Our goal was to ground redesign recommendations in real user behaviors rather than abstract best practices.

Key Objectives

  • Evaluate navigation structure and menu clarity
  • Assess search functionality and coherence
  • Test content discoverability in key sections
  • Evaluate help and support features
  • Analyze visual hierarchy and layout effectiveness

Key Research Findings

1. Confusing Navigation Structure

Users were unsure whether menu items like "Home" and "Search" were links or dropdowns. Items like "Collections" and "My Library Account" lacked clarity in their labeling.

"I wasn't sure if clicking 'Home' would take me to the homepage or open a dropdown - the behavior wasn't consistent."
Navigation issues

2. Redundant Search Functionality

The homepage featured multiple search bars without clear distinctions between them. Users struggled to understand whether searches would yield results from Ford Library, Duke Libraries, or third-party databases.

"There are too many search options and I never know which one to use for what I need."
Search issues

3. Career Resources Hidden

Valuable career tools were buried under the vague "Collections" label. Users expressed frustration at not being able to find tools they knew existed, like PitchBook and S&P Capital IQ.

"I remember the library staff presented these tools in class, but when I come back to the site later, I can never find them again."
Career tools issues

4. Help Features Hard to Find

The "Ask Us" label was misunderstood as a search function rather than a contact method. FAQ content was buried in long, unscannable pages that required excessive scrolling.

"I didn't realize the chat connected to a real person - I thought it was just another search box."
Help features issues

User Stories & Needs

Fuqua Master's Students

Primary User

"I usually visit when I need something specific like preparing for interviews or accessing business news. I want to immediately see what's most useful to me."

Key Needs:
  • Quick access to interview prep resources
  • Clear paths to major databases
  • Status indicators for live chat
  • Tools organized by use cases

Fuqua PhD Students

Secondary User

"I use the site in a focused way to verify library access for specific databases. I need precise search and clear login instructions."

Key Needs:
  • Academic publishing resources
  • Conference information
  • Journal rankings
  • Consistent navigation

Fuqua Faculty

Secondary User

"I need to verify student access to databases for my courses and refer students to resources confidently."

Key Needs:
  • Centralized faculty section
  • Course planning tools
  • Clearly marked support options
  • Clean, organized interface

Redesign Recommendations

1

Simplify Navigation

  • Consolidate menu items with clearer labels
  • Make all top-level items either links or dropdowns (not mixed)
  • Move career resources to a more prominent location
2

Streamline Search

  • Reduce redundant search bars
  • Clearly label what each search tool covers
  • Combine A-Z and Subject lists with filtering
3

Improve Help Features

  • Make chat more visible with availability indicator
  • Restructure FAQ into scannable sections
  • Add contextual help throughout the site
4

Modernize Visual Design

  • Create clear visual hierarchy on homepage
  • Remove unnecessary banners and social media icons
  • Improve mobile accessibility and touch targets

Redesign Samples

Based on our findings, we created high-fidelity mockups addressing key usability issues:


Reflection

This project reinforced the importance of grounding website improvements in real user behavior rather than assumptions. Through structured evaluation and collaborative feedback, we identified pain points that weren't obvious from analytics alone.

The most surprising finding was how much confusion stemmed from simple inconsistencies in navigation behavior. Small changes like making all top-level menu items behave consistently could have a significant impact on usability.

If we had more time, we would conduct follow-up testing with our redesigned prototypes to validate our solutions before implementation. We'd also explore creating personalized dashboard views for different user types (students, faculty, staff).